<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Stalker&#8217;s Notebook &#8211; The Paradox of Book Reviewing by Charles Tan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boomtron.com/2009/09/a-stalkers-notebook-the-paradox-of-book-reviewing-by-charles-tan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/09/a-stalkers-notebook-the-paradox-of-book-reviewing-by-charles-tan/</link>
	<description>Fantasy, Mystery, Science Fiction, Comic Books, Horror Book, Television, Movie Reviews, Author Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Cap</title>
		<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/09/a-stalkers-notebook-the-paradox-of-book-reviewing-by-charles-tan/#comment-4847</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Cap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bscreview.com/?p=35260#comment-4847</guid>
		<description>I will be honest, the only times I really will read a review (besides this site) is when I have already completed the book.  I think for me the term review tends to really mean &quot;start of a discussion&quot; if that makes any sense.  Just my take though on the whole process.  That holds true for books mostly and I think reviews can and need to be seperated by media when you talk about them.

For a video game per say, I will want to read the review and it will affect if I purchase the game or not.  Is it a money thing?  I dont know but games are more expensive.

Movies, well another area will I will read a review and it will influence my decision if I go or wait for it to show up on HBO.

DVDs, would already have read the movie review if not it would hold the same if it is a direct release to video.

Music, would rather just hear a sample than read a review.  If I already have heard the album or own it then the review agains becomes a jumping off point for discussion.

Television reviews since most television is free I want to make my own accessment regardless, so it becomes a discussion jump off point again.

When I write my reviews (if you can call them that) I try to give the reader parts of what I liked as well as an overall feeling of my experience.  So it is if you like what I have liked in the past you may like what I have just recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be honest, the only times I really will read a review (besides this site) is when I have already completed the book.  I think for me the term review tends to really mean &#8220;start of a discussion&#8221; if that makes any sense.  Just my take though on the whole process.  That holds true for books mostly and I think reviews can and need to be seperated by media when you talk about them.</p>
<p>For a video game per say, I will want to read the review and it will affect if I purchase the game or not.  Is it a money thing?  I dont know but games are more expensive.</p>
<p>Movies, well another area will I will read a review and it will influence my decision if I go or wait for it to show up on HBO.</p>
<p>DVDs, would already have read the movie review if not it would hold the same if it is a direct release to video.</p>
<p>Music, would rather just hear a sample than read a review.  If I already have heard the album or own it then the review agains becomes a jumping off point for discussion.</p>
<p>Television reviews since most television is free I want to make my own accessment regardless, so it becomes a discussion jump off point again.</p>
<p>When I write my reviews (if you can call them that) I try to give the reader parts of what I liked as well as an overall feeling of my experience.  So it is if you like what I have liked in the past you may like what I have just recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Tomio</title>
		<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/09/a-stalkers-notebook-the-paradox-of-book-reviewing-by-charles-tan/#comment-4843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Tomio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bscreview.com/?p=35260#comment-4843</guid>
		<description>To answer the (last) question,no,and generally I never have. I think it&#039;s more having to do with that I don&#039;t need any new more sources, and now i trust my sources enough where I don&#039;t need to read a review, they can just mention it. Even beyond that I&#039;ve always tended to be an impulse buyer, and if I want something I rarely find myself needing a second opinion (I would imagine books would be labeled as &#039;minor&#039; purchases when considering most budgets).

These days, I rarely buy any new book and most of my purchases are much older and specifically targeted (thus, again no need for any other opinion). I think for me, I&#039;m just old enough where purchasing decisions weren&#039;t net aided and I kind of (for the most part) carried on with that. I mean, I do research if I&#039;m buying land or something, not a book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer the (last) question,no,and generally I never have. I think it&#8217;s more having to do with that I don&#8217;t need any new more sources, and now i trust my sources enough where I don&#8217;t need to read a review, they can just mention it. Even beyond that I&#8217;ve always tended to be an impulse buyer, and if I want something I rarely find myself needing a second opinion (I would imagine books would be labeled as &#8216;minor&#8217; purchases when considering most budgets).</p>
<p>These days, I rarely buy any new book and most of my purchases are much older and specifically targeted (thus, again no need for any other opinion). I think for me, I&#8217;m just old enough where purchasing decisions weren&#8217;t net aided and I kind of (for the most part) carried on with that. I mean, I do research if I&#8217;m buying land or something, not a book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaolin Fire (GUD Magazine)</title>
		<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/09/a-stalkers-notebook-the-paradox-of-book-reviewing-by-charles-tan/#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaolin Fire (GUD Magazine)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bscreview.com/?p=35260#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>I strive, with the reviews I write, to make my personal bias very clear, painting a picture of the book/magazine that while obviously colored, still gives enough of a feel for the object that a reader hopefully comes away with an idea of whether they would like it on its own terms, rather than mine. I try to figure out what niche of people would actually like the book. There&#039;s not a book out there that _somebody_ wouldn&#039;t like, for some reason or other (be it kitsch, irony, or a downright &quot;fun, fast read&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strive, with the reviews I write, to make my personal bias very clear, painting a picture of the book/magazine that while obviously colored, still gives enough of a feel for the object that a reader hopefully comes away with an idea of whether they would like it on its own terms, rather than mine. I try to figure out what niche of people would actually like the book. There&#8217;s not a book out there that _somebody_ wouldn&#8217;t like, for some reason or other (be it kitsch, irony, or a downright &#8220;fun, fast read&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

