<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;The One True Thing&#8217; by Steven R. Boyett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boomtron.com/2009/10/the-one-true-thing-by-steven-r-boyett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/10/the-one-true-thing-by-steven-r-boyett/</link>
	<description>Fantasy, Mystery, Science Fiction, Comic Books, Horror Book, Television, Movie Reviews, Author Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip Patton</title>
		<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/10/the-one-true-thing-by-steven-r-boyett/#comment-7152</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bscreview.com/?p=39145#comment-7152</guid>
		<description>I enthusiastically agree! At least for fiction of the post-apocalyptic, speculative/fantasy variety.  A little concrete slab to stand on really enables the suspension of disbelief.  (Still I couldn&#039;t help flashing on Jack Palance holding up a single finger and saying &quot;One True Thing&quot; -- maybe your allusion was intended?)

But for other speculative fiction, particularly involving time travel to the future or teleportation to &quot;other worlds&quot;, the concrete item can become ludicrous.  They aren&#039;t likely to have six shooters, or speak anything remotely like English, even a few hundred years off.  You can pick your example in this category, I&#039;ve recently been reading A.E. Van Vogt&#039;s &quot;The Weapon Shops of Isher&quot;, and balking.  Yet it has to be relatable... what to do in that case?  (Just don&#039;t write it; or ask a lot more of your reader?)  In some cases, where our present doesn&#039;t mix with the built-world, I can accept things as analog.  I don&#039;t need to know that Men in Tolkien&#039;s Middle Earth didn&#039;t speak actual 20th century English; ditto for Frank Herbert&#039;s Dune.  
Anyway, I continue to look forward to picking up Elegy Beach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enthusiastically agree! At least for fiction of the post-apocalyptic, speculative/fantasy variety.  A little concrete slab to stand on really enables the suspension of disbelief.  (Still I couldn&#8217;t help flashing on Jack Palance holding up a single finger and saying &#8220;One True Thing&#8221; &#8212; maybe your allusion was intended?)</p>
<p>But for other speculative fiction, particularly involving time travel to the future or teleportation to &#8220;other worlds&#8221;, the concrete item can become ludicrous.  They aren&#8217;t likely to have six shooters, or speak anything remotely like English, even a few hundred years off.  You can pick your example in this category, I&#8217;ve recently been reading A.E. Van Vogt&#8217;s &#8220;The Weapon Shops of Isher&#8221;, and balking.  Yet it has to be relatable&#8230; what to do in that case?  (Just don&#8217;t write it; or ask a lot more of your reader?)  In some cases, where our present doesn&#8217;t mix with the built-world, I can accept things as analog.  I don&#8217;t need to know that Men in Tolkien&#8217;s Middle Earth didn&#8217;t speak actual 20th century English; ditto for Frank Herbert&#8217;s Dune.<br />
Anyway, I continue to look forward to picking up Elegy Beach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

