<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCIS: Los Angeles: &#8220;Random on Purpose&#8221; &#8211; review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boomtron.com/2009/11/ncis-los-angeles-random-on-purpose-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/11/ncis-los-angeles-random-on-purpose-review/</link>
	<description>Fantasy, Mystery, Science Fiction, Comic Books, Horror Book, Television, Movie Reviews, Author Interviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:33:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.boomtron.com/2009/11/ncis-los-angeles-random-on-purpose-review/#comment-133327</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bscreview.com/?p=42511#comment-133327</guid>
		<description>Yeah this was one of weakest episodes yet, there’s only so far you can stretch the cast before there’s not enough screen-time to hold on to any sort of cohesiveness. Still though, as underwhelming as this episode was, I think you’re right, it was almost certainly an idea they had that sounded great on paper, an experiment if you will, that just didn’t pan out. Hard to blame them for trying though. I’ve actually just been catching up on season 3 of NCIS LA. Cramming it all into the last couple of days, and I have to say, overall this show just seems to be getting better and better. Makes me glad my employer, DISH Network set up this awesome streaming site called dishonline(dot)com that has an enormous amount of content on it accessible at any time. It’s been so handy to me since I keep forgetting to set my DVR for this show among others, and I’ve also found a couple shows by browsing that I really enjoyed, that I doubt I would have ever heard about otherwise. It’s certainly worth a few minutes to browse and check it out for yourself, especially considering non-dish customers can view a good deal of the programming too without having to log in or create an account or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah this was one of weakest episodes yet, there’s only so far you can stretch the cast before there’s not enough screen-time to hold on to any sort of cohesiveness. Still though, as underwhelming as this episode was, I think you’re right, it was almost certainly an idea they had that sounded great on paper, an experiment if you will, that just didn’t pan out. Hard to blame them for trying though. I’ve actually just been catching up on season 3 of NCIS LA. Cramming it all into the last couple of days, and I have to say, overall this show just seems to be getting better and better. Makes me glad my employer, DISH Network set up this awesome streaming site called dishonline(dot)com that has an enormous amount of content on it accessible at any time. It’s been so handy to me since I keep forgetting to set my DVR for this show among others, and I’ve also found a couple shows by browsing that I really enjoyed, that I doubt I would have ever heard about otherwise. It’s certainly worth a few minutes to browse and check it out for yourself, especially considering non-dish customers can view a good deal of the programming too without having to log in or create an account or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

