8 responses to “PlayStation Moves and Shakes, Motion Controller Unveiled”

  1. Damon Cap

    This will make me buy another PS3 I can tell you that much.

  2. et

    “the gimmick of the imprecise Bluetooth “Wii-mote””

    vs

    “The Move and “subcontroller” are wireless via Bluetooth”

    your statement makes it sound if the bluetooth is a bad quality of the wiimote but an amazing feature of the PS3′s. Thats a little sensationalist/straight off a press release sounding to me.

    Additionally the Wiimote with the motionplus adapter does have pretty precise controls for titles that utilize the motionplus.

  3. B.T. Robertson

    The comment wasn’t meant to compare Bluetooth technologies to one-another, I was merely stating that both peripherals attach via Bluetooth. Also, Bluetooth isn’t what makes one thing more or less precise than something else, it’s the gyro and motion-sensing technologies present. My statements are accurate, and from all reports the Sony Move is much more precise than the Wii. I’m simply citing facts as they have been published thus far.

    How do my statements make it sound one way or another by way of mentioning Bluetooth? I’m confused by that.

  4. et

    I read through the Kotaku article and it doesn’t really give the Move a favorable light so far.

    The fact that the sony version of the nunchuck doesn’t have a gyroscope in it is a weird decision.

    Also if you haven’t played anything with the motion plus controls it really is a heck of a lot better. Grand Slam Tennis with motion plus is pretty sweet.

    I am by no means a Nintendo fan boy, but so far everything I’ve seen covering the Move doesn’t sound all that impressive, which I’m sad about because I really liked the eyetoy for the ps2.

    I think this all of a sudden opens up room for MS to impress with Natal and be something different from the Wii & PS3 now. Who knows if they’ll deliver though.

  5. B.T. Robertson

    Natal could very well top all motion technologies, if Microsoft’s hype is any indication. Guess we’ll see.

  6. B.T. Robertson

    http://gdc.gamespot.com/video/6253374/?tag=topslot;thumb;4#toggle_video

    “Sony has a lot of experience with this stuff.” I believe that Sony has technology that Nintendo doesn’t have. This is going to be much more fine-tuned, at the very least, but the bottom line is the software. Will the games break through the gimmick mold and allow for more in-depth experiences, or will it be a normal game with tacked-on controls? I’m rooting for the former. :)

  7. Jdigitalseven

    I dont know why, but the Bluetooth on the PS controller is phenomenally better than the Wii’s. The Wii has a sensor bar and still lags out noticeably even up close. The PS3 controller can be used from very far away and still functions fine. The Wii should have better or at least the same quality/range as the PS3 for Bluetooth….but thats obviously not the case if youve played both.

Leave a Reply