Don't miss

Robin Hood – movie review

ridley scott robin hood review

You know, since I was just a small girl, I have always been fascinated by the legends of British heroes. From King Arthur all the way to Peter Pan, there is something singularly original about the heroes of that place, and of them one of my very favorites has always been Robin Hood.

Which, I guess, is why this movie excited me so much; Robin Hood hasn’t taken to the big screen in years. And for all the things that were wrong with this movie – and there were a lot of things wrong with it – it won’t stop me from giving it a recommendation, because for all its flaws, this production does something right that will probably have me spending ten bucks to see it again.

File Ridley Scott’s latest movie under “attempting-to-be-historically-accurate reconstructions of legendary tales,” similar to the King Arthur flick that had Clive Owen and Kiera Knightley a few years back. Robin Longstride (Rusell Crowe) is a disenchanted Crusader who abandons his duties. On his way home, Robin meets the slaughtered caravan bearing King Richard the Lionheart’s crown back to London after he was murdered by a group of French invaders ushered into England by King John’s traitorous aide, Godfrey. Among the slaughtered men of the king, one is still alive – Robin Loxley, a friend of Richard the Lionheart, who asks Robin Longstride to take his sword to his elderly father in Nottingham.

The journey leads Robin Longstride to take the name Robin Loxley, blending the origin tales that say Robin was both a yeoman – a man of middle class – and a displaced nobleman, respectively.  Along the way he discovers secrets about his own origin, meets Maid Marian, fights a bunch of French invaders, and pisses off King John by being just slightly less popular than Jesus. This leads to Robin becoming an outlaw, but then again no one is really surprised by that.

Of the original Merry Men only three make the cut – Little John, Will Scarlet, and Allan-a-Dale. Much the Miller’s Son is nowhere to be found, and even though Little John is supposedly Robin’s lieutenant, he doesn’t seem to be any closer to Robin than the rest of them. Will Scarlet is appropriately amusing, and along with Friar Tuck make up my favorite parts of this movie. “I’m not a churchy friar,” says Friar Tuck. “Never have been.”

Of “robbing the rich and giving to the poor” there is very little – one scene, very amusingly written, but all too brief. The rest of the movie is devoted to stopping the invading Frenchmen, which, while very telling of Robin’s character and the time period that fostered him, had little to do with the tale of Robin Hood. The Sherriff of Nottingham is almost a nonentity, and Robin was not the playful outlaw from the tales, but a Very Serious Man who was almost always in need of a good drink and a laugh.

My one greatest grievance in this entire movie is Cate Blanchett. No matter what movie I see her in, she always seems to play Cate Blanchett – and here Marian loses all individuality in the face of it. Blanchett wasn’t bad, she just wasn’t very good, with the exception of one scene in which I felt she most embodied the character:  a scene in which a weary Marian, having just received terrible news, rests her head on Robin’s shoulder. That was when I forgot that Marian was Cate Blanchett and was able to properly recognize the character.

There are a few other nitpicks, but they are only nitpicks.  I found this to be a good movie with a few glaring flaws that are glaring only to the type of nerd who reads The Gest Of Robyn Hode for fun – for most people, this movie will be completely enjoyable, and I definitely recommend it.

About Emily Pritchard


  1. Dana

    May 16, 2010 at 10:36 pm

    Ummm, so does that mean you think Queen Bess, Bob Dylan, Kate Hepburn & Veronica Guerin are all Cate Blanchett? I’ve met Cate and she is so far from her characters onscreen it’s ludicrous to even make that statement. Now another Kate does that for me, Winslet. She is always playing the same type of characters in exactly the same way each & every time, so that Kate I’ll buy.

  2. Rosalind

    May 18, 2010 at 9:13 am

    Sounds interesting. I also have always loved British history and Robin Hood stories (although my favorite has the foxes … oo de lally?), but wasn’t too sure about this one. I probably still won’t see it in theaters, but might make my hubs add it to the netflix queue when it comes out! Too bad about Cate Blanchett, but I’ve never really liked her either!

  3. Joel V

    May 25, 2011 at 12:26 am

    I did like Robin Hood, even though there was a lot wrong with it. Anyways, I just finished Robin Hood on DISH Online, and it was pretty cool. I like being able to choose from different movies and shows whenever I want. With DISH Online, I can do that. Also, because I have an account, I have access to thousands more shows and movies at no additional cost! HBO is something I also subscribe to, so since I have that, I have even more to choose from! The possibilities are endless! I am an employee of DISH as well, so I have had a lot of time to play with the site and it is great! I definitely suggest taking a look at because I know it has something to offer anyone and everyone!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>