Comments on: Gareth Edwards’ Monsters – Notes from New Sodom https://www.boomtron.com/monsters-gareth-edwards-review/ Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:30:41 +0000 hourly 1 By: Emo https://www.boomtron.com/monsters-gareth-edwards-review/#comment-632578 Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:23:47 +0000 http://www.bscreview.com/?p=88776#comment-632578 Well, personally, I’m more interested in the method of analysis than in what it says about the movie specifically. Also, Hal’s given enough background (in terms of what happens in the movie, who the characters are, etc) for his remarks to be intelligible – to the people that are familiar with his analytical framework, that is.

]]> By: Jay Tomio https://www.boomtron.com/monsters-gareth-edwards-review/#comment-632577 Sun, 20 Feb 2011 21:08:57 +0000 http://www.bscreview.com/?p=88776#comment-632577 Emo,

I think it may be limited to people who have seen the movie, which (from what I can tell) isn’t a big number (I think I know one person who has seen it and they had to see at a film festival).

]]> By: Emo https://www.boomtron.com/monsters-gareth-edwards-review/#comment-632576 Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:50:35 +0000 http://www.bscreview.com/?p=88776#comment-632576 I find it decidedly stupid that no one’s commented on this yet.

On the other hand, there isn’t much to quibble about, since this a descriptive analysis. I wouldn’t say it’s an easy read for people unacquainted with your theory of narrative modalities, but for those who are it’s downright inspiring 🙂

So thanks a ton for this, Hal 🙂

]]>